We turned risky term sheets into a deal that protects the founder.

We turned risky term sheets into a deal that protects the founder.

We turned risky term sheets into a deal that protects the founder.

An AI startup in Europe received term sheets from top investors. The terms looked good, but some clauses reduced founder control. We identified traps, negotiated better terms, and helped close quickly.

Industry

AI / SaaS

Stage

Growth; VC round at term-sheet stage

Geography

Europe

How it works

Challenge

The client received term sheets from top investors. While the valuation and check size were attractive, clauses could limit founder control and slow decision-making. The founder needed to act quickly, as decoding legal nuances would impact execution and revenue.

  1. 01

    founder control (board structure / veto rights / share classes) strategic flexibility during scaling deal speed (long fundraising = real opportunity cost)

How it works

Solution

We took ownership of term-sheet analysis, mapped risks across options, and led negotiations to secure founder-friendly governance without slowing down the process. The key was aligning European operational reality with “US-style” venture expectations in the documents.

How it works

Our approach

Book an appointment

01

Diagnose

  • side-by-side comparison of multiple term sheets

  • list of hidden traps + their 12–24 month consequences

  • priorities defined: control, board, veto, equity, timeline

02

Design the target terms

  • recommended governance and negotiation strategy

  • “redlines” + fallback options (Plan A / Plan B)

  • investor-ready rationale for each change

03

Negotiate & close

  • negotiation leadership + document iteration

  • timeline management to avoid process drag

  • closing checklist so the founder returns to building

who we help

What we delivered

01

Share-class structure (Class A / Class B)

Goal: protect control while keeping the cap table investable.

02

Secondary for the founder (optional)

Goal: provide limited liquidity without distorting incentives.

03

Founder-aligned board setup

Goal: prevent governance paralysis during fast execution.

04

Reduced investor veto rights

Goal: fewer blockers, more operational speed.

05

Closing velocity

Goal: a fast path to signatures and closing, not months of churn.

How it works

Result

The founder secured terms that support hyper-growth rather than restricting it through governance traps. The round closed on a tight timeline, and the client quickly shifted focus back to execution — product, hiring, and revenue — instead of extended legal back-and-forth.

Founder-friendly governance (clear board dynamics, fewer veto blockers)

Better control and equity protection through the final structure

Fast close (speed as a tangible outcome)

Lower long-term legal risk from “hidden” clauses

More founder focus on building vs. fundraising admin

Founder-friendly governance (clear board dynamics, fewer veto blockers)

Fast close (speed as a tangible outcome)

More founder focus on building vs. fundraising admin

Better control and equity protection through the final structure

Lower long-term legal risk from “hidden” clauses

Founder-friendly governance (clear board dynamics, fewer veto blockers)

Better control and equity protection through the final structure

Fast close (speed as a tangible outcome)

Lower long-term legal risk from “hidden” clauses

More founder focus on building vs. fundraising admin

How it works

Result

$15M

$15M ARR in 12 months. Company momentum at the time of fundraising.

~3weeks to close

Speed from kickoff to signed documents and closing.

A famous VC logo doesn’t guarantee founder-friendly terms.

Author name

Let’s have a chat!

Book an appointment

Let’s have a chat!

Book an appointment

Let’s have a chat!

Book an appointment